5 Miscellaneous
Theorem 7.6.1 (Oddtown Theorem).label Let $[n]\define \curl{1,2,...,n}$ and $\F\suf\cali{P}([n])$ be a family such that $\abs{A}\congruent{1}{2}$ for all $A\in\F$ and $\abs{A\cap B}\congruent{0}{2}$ for all $A\neq B\in \F$. Then $\abs{F}\leq n$.
Proof. For each $A\in \F$ consider the indicator associated with $A$, $\indi{A}\in \bb{F}^{n}_{2}$ defined by
Observe that $\indi{A}\cd \indi{B}=\abs{A\cap B}$ so the hypothesis is equivalent to
- (1)
$\indi{A}\cd \indi{A}\congruent{1}{2}$
- (2)
$\indi{A}\cd\indi{B}\congruent{0}{2}$
for all $A\neq B\in\F$. If there is a linear relation over $\bb{F}_{2}$ then
Using (2) we have for each $B\in\F$
showing that
We shall now provide a proof over $\Q$ or any field of characteristic $0$ (as $\Q$ embeds there). For each $A\in \F$ consider the indicator associated with $A$, $\indi{A}\in \Q^{n}$ defined by
Observe that $\indi{A}\cd \indi{B}=\abs{A\cap B}$ so the hypothesis is equivalent to
- (1)
$\indi{A}\cd \indi{A}\congruent{1}{2}$
- (2)
$\indi{A}\cd\indi{B}\congruent{0}{2}$
for all $A\neq B\in\F$. Let $m=\abs{\cali{F}}$ and write $\cali{F}=\curl{A_1,...,A_m}$. Let the matrix $M$ whose $k^{th}$ column is $\indi{A_k}$ with the canonical identification of $\indi{A}\bij (\indi{A}(\el))\in \Q^{n}$ where $\el\in[n]$ then $X\define M^{T}M$ is the matrix such that $X_{ij}=\abs{A_i\cap A_j}$. By (1) and (2)
in particular $\det(X)\neq 0$. We conclude
$\square$
Theorem 7.6.2 (Odd Oddtown).label Let $\cali{F}\suf\cali{P}([n])$ be a family such that for all $A\neq B\in\cali{F}$
- (a)
$\abs{A}\congruent{0}{2}$
- (b)
$\abs{A\cap B}\congruent{1}{2}$
then
- (1)
$\abs{\F}\leq n+1$
- (2)
$\abs{\F}\leq n$
Proof. Using the same set up as Oddtown Theorem 7.6.1 over $\bb{F}_{2}$ we have the hypothesis is equivalent to
- (1)
$\indi{A}\cd \indi{A}\congruent{0}{2}$
- (2)
$\indi{A}\cd\indi{B}\congruent{1}{2}$
We now define a new family $\cali{F}'\suf\cali{P}([n+1])$ by
which satisfies Oddtown Theorem 7.6.1 so $\abs{F}=\abs{F'}\leq n+1$. If there is a linear relation over $\bb{F}_{2}$ that is not the trivial relation then fix $B\in\F$ we have
Let $C\neq B\in\F$ then over $\bb{F}_{2}$
Hence $c_{B}=c_{C}$ for any $B,C\in\F$ and so $c_{A}=1$ for all $A\in\F$ and
Taking dot product with $\indi{B}$ again we see
showing that $\abs{\F}$ is odd. Observe that
so for each $A\in\F$ we have
where $V$ is the subspace of vectors with even number of $1$ in coordinates and $\dim V=n-1$ as the kernel of the linear functional $x\mto x\cd\indi{[n]}$. Using the trick of $\F'$ we consider
and using the hypothesis we have
- (1)
$\indi{A'}\cd \indi{A'}\congruent{1}{2}$
- (2)
$\indi{A'}\cd\indi{B'}\congruent{0}{2}$
So $\curl{\indi{A'}:A'\in\F'}$ is linearly independent over $\bb{F}_{2}$ and we conclude
as desired.$\square$
Lemma 7.6.3.label Let $R$ be a unital ring, $M$ be a left $R$-module, $\p:M\to R$ be an $R$-linear map and suppose there exists $e\in M$ such that $\p(e)=1_{R}$ then $M=\ker\p\op Re$
Proof. Let $m\in M$ then consider $m_{0}\define m-\p(m)e$
If $r e\in\ker\p$ for some $r\in R$ then
showing the sum is direct.$\square$
Post a Comment